My Assessment |
---|
|
Resources | ||
---|---|---|
Dangers of 5G and EMF on Youtube an interview with Dr. Joseph Mercola |
Dr. Joseph Mercola is a board-certified family doctor and creator of mercola.com, the most visited natural health website on the internet. His mission with mercola.com is to create a harmonious community of educated and open-minded individuals who, like him, are determined to change the modern health paradigm.
A fairly comprehensive overview of the concerns surrounding 5G and it's impact on the human organism. |
|
Protect Yourself from 5G with Dr. Joseph Mercola 38 minute video interview on Youtube. |
In this episode, Dr. Mercola talks with Dr. V about his new book EMF*D : 5G, Wi-Fi & Cell Phones: Hidden Harms and How to Protect Yourself. With the advent of 5G ultra-wideband technology, the danger of electronic pollution is now greater than ever. With this radical new understanding of how electromagnetic fields impact your body and mind, Dr. Mercola has laid out what EMFs actually are, where you find them in your daily life, and how you can repair the damage done at a cellular level. | |
5G is a Military Weapon with Reiner Fuëllmich 14 minute video interview with Stew Peters on Youtube, also discusses connection with the COVID-19 “pandemic”. |
Dr. Fuëllmich is a well-known lawyer, famous for successfully suing Deutsche Bank for mortgage fraud and Volkswagen for their emissions scandal. Fuëllmich was one of the early voices, speaking out in 2020 regarding violations of law and the medical and scientific fraud that was, and still is, the COVID-19 “pandemic”.
Fuëllmich was spearheading a project known as the “Second Nuremberg”, and co-founded the Corona Investigative Committee. His Committee consulted about a hundred and fifty scientists and experts from around the world, as well as former employees of the World Health Organization, and their findings showed them that the COVID measures were the first steps in a plan to destroy regional economies in order to make populations dependent upon global supply chains, and were intended to reduce the population and install a world government under the United Nations. |
|
Adverse health effects of 5G mobile networking technology under real-life conditions An article in the US National Library of Medicine, published on PubMed by Ronald N Kostoff, Paul Heroux, Michael Aschner and Aristides Tsatsakis. |
Abstract This article identifies adverse effects of non-ionizing non-visible radiation (hereafter called wireless radiation) reported in the premier biomedical literature. It emphasizes that most of the laboratory experiments conducted to date are not designed to identify the more severe adverse effects reflective of the real-life operating environment in which wireless radiation systems operate. Many experiments do not include pulsing and modulation of the carrier signal. The vast majority do not account for synergistic adverse effects of other toxic stimuli (such as chemical and biological) acting in concert with the wireless radiation. This article also presents evidence that the nascent 5G mobile networking technology will affect not only the skin and eyes, as commonly believed, but will have adverse systemic effects as well. |
|
Health risks from radiofrequency radiation, including 5G, should be assessed by experts with no conflicts of interest An article in Oncology Letters by Lennart Hardell and Michael Carlberg |
Abstract The fifth generation, 5G, of radiofrequency (RF) radiation is about to be implemented globally without investigating the risks to human health and the environment. This has created debate among concerned individuals in numerous countries. In an appeal to the European Union (EU) in September 2017, currently endorsed by >390 scientists and medical doctors, a moratorium on 5G deployment was requested until proper scientific evaluation of potential negative consequences has been conducted. This request has not been acknowledged by the EU. The evaluation of RF radiation health risks from 5G technology is ignored in a report by a government expert group in Switzerland and a recent publication from The International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection. Conflicts of interest and ties to the industry seem to have contributed to the biased reports. The lack of proper unbiased risk evaluation of the 5G technology places populations at risk. Furthermore, there seems to be a cartel of individuals monopolizing evaluation committees, thus reinforcing the no-risk paradigm. We believe that this activity should qualify as scientific misconduct. |
|
EMF Scientists Appeal to the United Nations Video produced by National Institute for Science, Law & Public Policy. |
Spokesman Martin Blank, PhD of Columbia University representing 190 international scientists in an Appeal to the UN, UN Member States and the WHO on the risks of electromagnetic fields emitted by telecommunications and utility technologies. Cautioning strongly, Dr. Blank says, “The time to deal with the harmful biological and health effects is long overdue. To protect our children, ourselves and our ecosystem, we must reduce exposure by establishing more protective guidelines.” .
|
|
Effects of electromagnetic fields exposure on the antioxidant defense system An article in the US National Library of Medicine, published on PubMed by Elfide Gizem Kıvrak, Kıymet Kübra Yurt, Arife Ahsen Kaplan, Işınsu Alkan, and Gamze Altun |
Abstract Technological devices have become essential components of daily life. However, their deleterious effects on the body, particularly on the nervous system, are well known. Electromagnetic fields (EMF) have various chemical effects, including causing deterioration in large molecules in cells and imbalance in ionic equilibrium. Despite being essential for life, oxygen molecules can lead to the generation of hazardous by-products, known as reactive oxygen species (ROS), during biological reactions. These reactive oxygen species can damage cellular components such as proteins, lipids and DNA. Antioxidant defense systems exist in order to keep free radical formation under control and to prevent their harmful effects on the biological system. Free radical formation can take place in various ways, including ultraviolet light, drugs, lipid oxidation, immunological reactions, radiation, stress, smoking, alcohol and biochemical redox reactions. Oxidative stress occurs if the antioxidant defense system is unable to prevent the harmful effects of free radicals. Several studies have reported that exposure to EMF results in oxidative stress in many tissues of the body. Exposure to EMF is known to increase free radical concentrations and traceability and can affect the radical couple recombination. The purpose of this review was to highlight the impact of oxidative stress on antioxidant systems. |
|
Planetary electromagnetic pollution: it is time to assess its impact Paper published in The Lancet by Oceania Radiofrequency Scientific Advisory Association, an independent scientific organisation. |
Outline a discussion on the rapid global proliferation of artificial electromagnetic fields would now be apt; most notable is the blanket of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation, largely microwave radiation generated for wireless communication and surveillance technologies, as mounting scientific evidence suggests that prolonged exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation has serious biological and health effects. However, public exposure regulations in most countries continue to be based on the guidelines of the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection and Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, which were established in the 1990s on the belief that only acute thermal effects are hazardous. Prevention of tissue heating by radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation is now proven to be ineffective in preventing biochemical and physiological interference. For example, acute non-thermal exposure has been shown to alter human brain metabolism by NIH scientists, electrical activity in the brain, and systemic immune responses. Chronic exposure has been associated with increased oxidative stress and DNA damage and cancer risk. Laboratory studies, including large rodent studies by the US National Toxicology Program and Ramazzini Institute of Italy, confirm these biological and health effects in vivo. |
|
Effects of Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields: Thirty Years of Research A summary/review by Dr. Henry Lai, Professor Emeritus at the University of Washington. |
Outline The preponderance of peer-reviewed independent research published from 1990 through January 2024 has found significant adverse effects from exposure to radio frequency radiation and extremely low frequency and static electromagnetic fields. Dr. Lai reports that the research has found that exposure to RFR or ELF EMF produces oxidative effects or free radicals, and damages DNA. Moreover the vast majority of studies that examined genetic, neurological and reproductive outcomes has found significant effects: 79% of more than 1,500 studies of RFR, and 87% of more than 900 studies of ELF and static fields reported significant effects. |
|
Publications promoting a conflicting view to the above concerns are numerous.
|
The official line Industry-funded "research" studies have produced uniform conclusions which can be loosely summarised as concluding 5G is “safe and effective”. EG our very own Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency concludes in it's Base Station Survey 2007- 2013 that “it is the assessment of ARPANSA and international health authorities such as the World Health Organisation (WHO) and the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation (ICNIRP) that there is no established scientific evidence to support adverse health effects.” |
|
![]() |
return to top of this page | ![]() |
http://fergusreilly.com/5G/index.html | || | || | updated 20 Mar 24 |